Project Management Assignment: Critical Analysis On The Organizational Structure Of Uber

Question

Task: A project is a temporary endeavour undertaken to provide an expected and beneficial outcome. A project life cycle is the series of phases that a project passes through from its initiation to its closure. Project goals should align with organisational goals such as improved operations or increased revenues, reducing costs or improving efficiencies.
Before resources can be committed to a project, the reason for its proposal and the benefits it is expected to deliver need to be understood by people in positions empowered to make decisions about the expenditure of an organisation's resources. The selection of organisational projects is typically performed through a method of classification and review of the project’s business case. That method of course should be applied consistently to all project proposals.
In essay writing, use the given/approved project throughout this assessment.
As you have discovered in your learning resources, examine project selection methods that can be applied appropriately to the given project and processes to conduct these methods. Consider the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) and describe the initial process group and project documents that are created or used as inputs for a new project. Your assessment should contain 1500 words.

Answer

Introduction
The main objective of this Project management assignment is to critically analyze the role of project management for any organizational structure such as Uber. It defines the overall operability index that is associated with any major project across an organization. Initiatives for successful completion of projects are based on describing the desired results and thus needs to be assessed and implemented all along the organizational structure. This report illustrates different aspects of a project management at Uber based on building an application for its drivers, based on knowledge that is associated to provide a more impulsive form of operation across the desired sections under any major or minor project. It explains initial process groups and project documentation processes as the key to indicate a more vital form of operation across the desired sections (Meredith, Mantel & Shafer, 2017). Different approaches, ethical codes, tools and techniques as well as risk management constituents are discussed thoroughly in order to enhance the overall process under the project management.

PMBOK knowledge areas and process groups at Uber
PMBOK knowledge areas are significant in a project management process as these include each of the sections that are liable to contribute across the desired formats. The factors identified in the study examined in the project management assignment such as integration, scope, cost, schedule, quality, resource, risk, communication, procurement and stakeholder management play an important role in adjusting the different outcomes all across the operations. Each of the defined factors are based on improvising the process of application building at each constituent levels and inclining the success factor in order to achieve a productive approach (Marchewka, 2016). The process groups are liable to analyze these areas and attain a more suitable format for providing better results all across the respective areas.

The study used to develop this Project management assignment signifies that entire process of Uber’s driver centric application building is vast and requires constant monitoring and evaluation to achieve long term success. Thus these areas are integrated with process groups and a more intensive form of approach is required to initiate better results. These knowledge areas can be affected by any major issue at any possible time section, thus the operational benefits are directly related to the desired outcomes. This provides an elevated form of approach to establish better outcomes all along the project management process (Joslin & Müller, 2015). The interactive abilities which are available across each knowledge area are directly based on improvising the desired network and process groups to facilitate a more ideal approach all across the project management process. Each of the designated operations are based on justifying different sections thus the process groups for every sections are useful in order to carryout operations smoothly.

What is the role of PMI's Code of Ethics in the context of this Project management assignment for Uber’s project management?
The PMI's code of ethics across a project management process is integrated with sufficient ideologies and approaches to avail better results. It provides the project management process with the best possible approaches to decision making and validate sufficient inclusion of resources, environment and people across the project management process. The segments covered on this Project management assignment prove the efficiency of four sections of the code of ethics that are suitable to promote a more ideal nature of operation across the project management process. These include responsibility, fairness, honesty and responsibility (Hornstein, 2015). It helps in facilitating inclusion of ethics across real time projects and its related practices across the desired sections. An ethically organized process is liable to operate with better professional and standards for operation. It is evident in promoting trust and faith possibilities across the system and provides with a more reliable form of operation across the desired jurisdictions. Moral behaviors and mind-set are the two further included sections and are liable to provide a better operability in terms of support across the organizations (Todorovi? et al. 2015). Ethically justified project management practices are liable to improvise the entire decision making and reduce risks across the available set of operations. Therefore, after analyzing the readings covered in this Project management assignment, it can be stated that each of the segmented forms across this system is suitable to integrate better outcomes in comparatively less time segment. Valuing other and their respective decisions are an important factor for availing the desired sections of processes. Each of the significant approaches based on available trends are limited and are controlled through fair practices all the time. Increased transparency across these jurisdictions is liable to improvise the whole process and its related outcomes across the desired sections of project management process.

Role, relevance and impact on project management
The PMBOK knowledge areas, project groups and PMI’s code of ethics have an important role to play across the desired sections of project management. Each of these sections are liable to implement a more ideal nature of project management to distinguish between the available resources and required ones (Papke-Shields & Boyer-Wright, 2017). The entire section of process explored in the project management assignment report is based on distributing supportive outcomes and facilitating improvised ways to tackle issues across the process. Each of the knowledge areas associated with a project provide them with support in terms of best practices and feasible results all along the desired sections. Factors such as integration, quality, procurement and risks are of major importance and thus must be analyzed to facilitate a more ideal approach towards the designation of operations in an effectively controlled manner. Another set of areas such as cost, scope, resource and stakeholders are also crucial for a project management process and thus must be acknowledged in order to attain success. These areas improvise the project management process at each constituent level and are eligible for managing better outcomes for the entire section of project management (Svejvig & Andersen, 2015).

In addition to this, it can also be noted in the context of this project management assignment that code of ethics helps in eliminating risks and facilitating better results all across the process. Each of the diversified possibilities across decision making is liable to improvise the available outcomes and benefits. Ethical codes provide a more intensive form of liability to the project managers to practice efficient project monitoring possibilities which help in raising the overall standard of the process extensively. The entire system is based on driving positivity all across the system which is ideal for the process to be successful (de Carvalho, Patah & de Souza Bido, 2015). In this context, the argument raised on this project management assignment is focused on the concept of code of ethics which is based on illustrating the best practices across system and provides a fundamentally organized set of operations all along the process. Ethics also help in concluding the outcomes and providing a more ideal way to control the included resources in a sophisticated way which improves the entire segment by many folds.

Project management approaches for Uber
Project management approaches are ideal for facilitating operations in a more suitable manner and are liable to improvise the entire structure eventually. Achieving specific set of objectives and goals need a more dedicated approach which can guide the related outcomes and achieve a more organized set of functionalities (Conforto et al. 2016).

Following are some of the major project management approaches:

• Phased approach
• Lean project management (A3 problem solving and 6 sigma DMAIC).
• Incremental and iterative project management
• Critical chain project management
• Process based management
• Benefits realization management
• Earned value management

All of these project management approaches discussed above in the project management assignment are evident in promoting the whole segment of Uber’s driver centric application building through managing operations effectively and efficiently. These are inclined to facilitate a cooperation from the ethical sources and knowledge areas which improvises the entire structure and adds greater values to the whole process of project management (Martens & Carvalho, 2017).

Uber’s project management tools and techniques
Project management techniques and tools improvise the whole process and provide additional values to the whole process of project management. Following are some of the most important techniques (Samset & Volden, 2016).

• Classic technique
• Waterfall technique
• Agile project management
• Rational unified process
• Program evaluation and review technique
• Critical path technique
• Extreme project management
• Critical chain technique

Project management tools:

• MS Project (Organizing workflow and planning
• Skype and Slack (Communication)
• ActiTIME (Time management
• ActiPLANS (Scheduling)
• QuickBooks, Zoho, Freshbooks (Accounting and finance)

Risk management
Considering the findings of the study obtained in the Project management assignment, it can be stated that identification, analysis and responding to the available risks across a project management process are the main operations across a risk management process. As a risk is a potential which can be held accountable for facilitating issues in coming future, each of the desired sections in a project management needs to be analyzed with possibilities of risks (ul Musawir et al. 2017). Operations related to identifying, categorization, prioritizing and planning are ideal to analyze the required aspects all along the process. Each of these aspects are liable to accomplish better results and are liable to manage the present results all along the process. Each of the segmented aspects that are associated with this process are based on continuous assessment and operations for the fragmented processes all across the system (Qazi et al. 2016). Risk management is ideal for facilitating smooth operations and justifications for the processes all along the desired network of project management.

Conclusion
From the overall analysis conducted in this Project management assignment, it can be stated that Project management is a crucial process and requires a series of operations to facilitate better results as a whole across the Uber’s driver centric application building project. The dimensions and jurisdictions based on PMBOK knowledge areas and process groups are implanted within the project management process to facilitate better outcomes and improvise the desired set of operational accountabilities all along the system. This report explores the relevance which these knowledge areas have in order to attain a better operational design across the system of project management based on Uber’s driver centric application building. Each of the related sections are assessed and explained to define the exact operational nature associated with it. In addition to this, it can also be stated in the context of this Project management assignment that the tools and techniques required for facilitating the project management process in an evident manner are also explored within the justified sections. A risk management factor which plays important role is also assessed in the latter sections of this report.

References:
Conforto, E. C., Amaral, D. C., da Silva, S. L., Di Felippo, A., & Kamikawachi, D. S. L. (2016). The agility construct on project management theory. Project management assignment International Journal of Project Management, 34(4), 660-674.

de Carvalho, M. M., Patah, L. A., & de Souza Bido, D. (2015). Project management and its effects on project success: Cross-country and cross-industry comparisons. International Journal of Project Management, 33(7), 1509-1522.

Hornstein, H. A. (2015). The integration of project management and organizational change management is now a necessity. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 291-298.

Joslin, R., & Müller, R. (2015). Relationships between a project management methodology and project success in different project governance contexts. International Journal of Project Management, 33(6), 1377-1392.

Marchewka, J. T. (2016). Information technology project management: Providing measurable organizational value. John Wiley & Sons.

Martens, M. L., & Carvalho, M. M. (2017). Key factors of sustainability in project management context: A survey exploring the project managers' perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 35(6), 1084-1102.

Meredith, J. R., Mantel Jr, S. J., & Shafer, S. M. (2017). Project management: a managerial approach. John Wiley & Sons.

Papke-Shields, K. E., & Boyer-Wright, K. M. (2017). Strategic planning characteristics applied to project management. Project management assignment International Journal of Project Management, 35(2), 169-179.

Qazi, A., Quigley, J., Dickson, A., & Kirytopoulos, K. (2016). Project Complexity and Risk Management (ProCRiM): Towards modelling project complexity driven risk paths in construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 34(7), 1183-1198.

Samset, K., & Volden, G. H. (2016). Project management assignment Front-end definition of projects: Ten paradoxes and some reflections regarding project management and project governance. International Journal of Project Management, 34(2), 297-313.

Svejvig, P., & Andersen, P. (2015). Rethinking project management: A structured literature review with a critical look at the brave new world. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 278-290.

Todorovi?, M. L., Petrovi?, D. ?., Mihi?, M. M., Obradovi?, V. L., & Bushuyev, S. D. (2015). Project success analysis framework: A knowledge-based approach in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 33(4), 772-783.

ul Musawir, A., Serra, C. E. M., Zwikael, O., & Ali, I. (2017). Project governance, benefit management, and project success: Towards a framework for supporting organizational strategy implementation. Project management assignment International Journal of Project Management, 35(8), 1658-1672.