Personal Leadership Model: A Detailed Report
Question
Task: Provide a detailed report on the personal Leadership model.
Answer
Introduction
It is the responsibility of a leader of the organization to ascertain the constructive relationship with the respective subordinates. The leader could not influence the subordinates towards a particular goal with strained relations with them. To sustain a healthy relationship with the subordinates and workers, it is very crucial that the leader will follow a personal leadership model. The term leadership signifies the act of commanding the faction of subordinates in the company, whether the working environment is official or unofficial (Ross, 2014). The overall development of the team is considered more important by the leader than the personal growth of the employees. However, the leader should have the understanding that an inclusive result from the group could only be derived by employing eligible individuals with advanced skill sets (Mastrangelo et al., 2004). In this report on the personal leadership model, the three major aspects of an organization, i.e. the teamwork, management, and multiculturalism are discussed. The leader should have a detailed vision of the future of the business. The leader should invest regular effort in upgrading the current business process of the organization and should lead its course in a new direction (Bernotavicz et al., 2013). Hence it is highly recommended that the leader of the organization should not only focus on the individual up-gradation of each employee but also on the overall performance enhancement of the whole team. A more detailed aspect of the personal leadership model is discussed in the below section of this report.
It is discussed in the brief personal leadership model provided above that the responsibility of handling the team members and other staff members is envisaged on the leader of the organization. The performance regarding the quality of products, pace of production, customer satisfaction, etc. should be supervised by the person at the position of a leader. It is very crucial that every unit in an organization should work in coordination to attain a common goal (Hernandez, 2008). The major intention behind discussing this aspect is that the leaders should possess these specific attributes to lead the organization from the front by taking an estimated risk in a crucial time. The major attributes that the personal leadership model should focus on are teamwork, management, and multiculturalism. By adopting the charismatic leadership style, a higher level of efficiency could be brought to the personal leadership model. A higher understanding of various cultures in the society would help the leader in addressing various preferences of the employees, and handling the interlinked global economy. The inclusion of various elements in the personal leadership model would help the leader in increasing the impact of individual leadership style.
By mastering the various aspects of culture and dimensions of society, a person could place himself/ herself as one of the successful leaders in the competitive market. It is the person who could derive most of the output from a team that could be termed as an efficient and successful leader. It is the concept of service and transaction, which is majorly subdued by the leader (Sosik, 2005). It is the approach of service and hard work that the true leaders take to set the right example before the subordinates. A transparent relation with the staff members could be developed by the person if the mentioned personal leadership model is adopted. It is the transparency in the approach of the leader, which builds up trust among the workers and eventually leads up to high organizational productivity and coordinated teamwork.
The future goals and the strategies to be implied in the organization could be ascertained earlier by following the leadership philosophy mentioned in the above described personal leadership model. The appropriate approach would help the higher officials in estimating long-term goals. Though the leader could ascertain appropriate strategies and visionary ideologies for the company quite easily, the activities and efforts would go in vain if the employees are not following the orders. The strategies made by the leaders should be achievable and practicable from the perspective of the employees (Odom et al., 2012). Apart from the leader, the managing team is also endorsed with some of the responsibilities and should support the decisions made by the leader by actively participating in the organizational activities. The innovative strategies and real feedbacks would help the higher authority in practising effective leadership. The managing body is allowed to make recommendations to the higher authority to make certain changes in the adopted personal leadership model. It is the managers who supervise and instructs the base level employees on what duties to commit. Though the leaders should take note that the managing body should not take an autocratic approach while interacting with the employees. The fact that it is the constructive team effort that would bring success to the organization should be made aware of every unit of the organization. There should be no compromise in the teamwork (Morrison, 2000). Since managerial officials operate in a power-driven environment, it is quite possible that they would end up forcing certain decisions on the team members. The same element sometimes makes strong defiance among the employees, and thus the managers have to face strong opposition in their working environment. To counter this situation, it is strongly recommended that the managing officials should consider the feedback and opinion of the subordinates before implying any decisions or strategies. However, the dilemma happens when the higher official wants the managers to make a more aggressive approach towards the employees. The contradiction in approaches often makes the managers go through immense pressure.
There is a huge difference between the ideologies of leadership and management, and the same should be made aware to each and every member of the organization. The leader should always maintain the helping mentality while dealing with the needs and requirements of the subordinates and employees. Employees should always be provided with credit for their achievements. Ignoring the contribution of the employees would always create irritation and contempt among them. The leadership should always try to sustain the Emotional Intelligence of the employees to avoid any problems among them (Komives et al., 2006). The person positioned as the leader could behave as a friend with the workers rather than using an assertive leadership style to derive out higher efficiency. The employees would find it easier to provide honest feedback if the leaders have a friendly attitude in the organization. It is on the numerical output of the organization which is majorly focused by the managerial department so that a higher amount of profit and turnover could be generated in a short period (Jenster & Steiler, 2011). The major objective and approach of the leaders towards the business should be very formal and systematic. The major aim should be to bring a higher level of innovation and productivity to the organization. The approaches of formal and informal leaders are very different. Whereas the formal leaders are always conscious of the managerial duties and the organizational goals, the informal leaders are not tensed about any responsibilities related to the management. The person designated at the position of a manager always follows the formal leadership. They are only allowed to take an informal stance only when they are dealing with the personal issues of the subordinates. Though the argument still prevails that whether there is a substantial difference between the concepts of management and leadership or, it is just theoretical and subtle in nature. The subjective analysis in this report reveals that the process behind these two processes is very subtle, where one takes a nicer approach towards the employee, and the other takes a stern attitude.
The personal leadership model should be drafted only after considering the various respective attributes. It is based on subjective planning which would determine the implication style of the model. A proper planning session should be conducted by the leaders before creating a proper personal leadership model. The act of planning is not a frivolous act, and appropriate measures should be taken to conduct it efficiently. Hence it is the duty of a leader that proper effort is invested behind the brainstorming session in making proper strategies and to make the employees regarding their duties (Gialamas, 2014). The duties of managers are also very demanding and crucial so that they could highly contribute to the success of their leaders. It would ensure a sustainable level of performance from the subordinates. The short goals should be selected to be completed by the management rather than focusing on long-term goals. It is only by sustaining high effort and quality of performance in the short-term goals that will ensure the success in long term programs. We have arrived at the observation in the analysis conducted in this personal leadership model report that a proper level of motivation should be given to the employees. The leaders should keep an open mind so that they would learn valuable lessons from the experienced subordinates. It is not applicable to run an organization by relying on a single person's opinion. By dealing with the subordinates with proper respect would create an impression that they are well considered in the organization. Going along with the team would provide the stage for deeper learning of the business circumstances.
References
Ross, S. (2014). A conceptual model for understanding the process of self-leadership development and action-steps to promote personal leadership development. Journal of Management Development.
Mastrangelo, A., Eddy, E. R., & Lorenzet, S. J. (2004). The importance of personal and professional leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal.
Bernotavicz, F., McDaniel, N. C., Brittain, C., & Dickinson, N. S. (2013). Leadership in a changing environment: A leadership model for child welfare. Administration in Social Work, 37(4), 401-417.
Hernandez, M. (2008). Promoting stewardship behaviour in organizations: A leadership model. Journal of business ethics, 80(1), 121-128.
Sosik, J. J. (2005). The role of personal values in the charismatic leadership of corporate managers: A model and preliminary field study. The leadership quarterly, 16(2), 221-244.
Odom, S. F., Boyd, B. L., & Williams, J. (2012). Impact of Personal Growth Projects on Leadership Identity Development. Journal of Leadership Education, 11(1).
Morrison, A. J. (2000). Developing a global leadership model. Human resource management, 39(2?3), 117-131.
Komives, S. R., Longerbeam, S. D., Owen, J. E., Mainella, F. C., & Osteen, L. (2006). A leadership identity development model: Applications from a grounded theory. Journal of College Student Development, 47(4), 401-418.
Jenster, N. P., & Steiler, D. (2011). 'Turning up the volume' in inter-personal leadership: motivating and building cohesive global virtual teams during times of economic crisis. In Advances in global leadership. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Gialamas, S., Pelonis, P., & Medeiros, S. (2014). Metamorphosis: A collaborative leadership model to promote educational change. International Journal of Progressive Education, 10(1).
