Leadership Assignment: Case Analysis of Mangrove & Bendigo Community Bank

Question

Task: Consider the case study of Mangrove Community Bank Enterprise Ltd and The Bendigo Community Bank Inotiative and write an evidence based report on leadership assignmentwhich responds in an analytical and critical way to each of the given questions.

Definition of Leadership for Social Impact
• How would you define leadership for social impact?

Community Bank as Leadership for Social Impact
• Using case study evidence, explain how The Bendigo Community Bank Initiative is an example of leadership for social impact?

Leadership traits
• Using case study evidence can you identify some typical traits of rural social enterprise leaders? Do you believe these traits help or hinder the development of rural social enterprise?

Definition of Distributed Leadership
• Define what is meant by distributed leadership?
Distributed Leadership: An effective model for social impact?
‘Distributed leadership offers an effective model of leadership for the Mangrove Community Bank’. Do you agree with this statement? Give 3 reasons for your answer

Answer

Overview of leadership assignment
Leadership for social impact signifies the most important or the optimistic alterations which solve or at least address the social injustice and the dilemmas. Several businesses and companies attain these targets by the means of aware as well as purposeful efforts or acts within their organizational functions and administrations (Weick et al., 2005). This assignment will focus on the leadership for social impact with a concept clearing in-depth definition and will also focus on the Bendigo Community Bank initiative with proper utilization of the provided case study. The Bendigo Community Bank is the most relevant example for social impact and the leadership traits will also be discussed utilizing the case study. This assignment will highlight the typical traits of the rural social enterprise leaders and will also focus on whether these traits help or hinder the development of rural social enterprise (Kirkpatick and Locke, 1991). Secondly, the concept of distributed leadership will also be discussed with proper explanation, which will provide a clear cut understanding of how this works and about the entire thing as well. The term distributed leadership mainly refers to the conceptual as well as analytical approach for understanding how the work of the leadership takes place within the people as well as in the context of a multifaceted organization (Banks et al., 2021). Lastly, this assignment will highlight the area regarding how distributed leadership offers an effective model of leadership for the Mangrove community Bank. It will emphasise the statement and will summarise whether this is correct or not with three reasons and will provide a proper conclusion at the end of it.

Definition of Leadership for Social Impact
Leadership for Social impacts have been creating waves as well as alterations in numerous sections of a company’s functions (Routhieaux, 2015). From the method it is being evaluated how the trades carry out their functions to the areas that are being chosen by the customer to buy, social impacts are turning out to be more vital to a lot of people. Without a doubtthat are methods to direct diversity as well as inclusion and also the other areas like the Social Impact Theory which will influence the social impact as well(Routhieaux, 2015).

When there is no simple method for trades as well as companies to decrease the social expenses, there are a lot of methods to attain the social impacts. Many traders as well as companies, and foundations are putting their aware efforts in the direction of achieving greater and the leaders are trying their best to put effort with their leadership to make a social impact(Chou and Naimi, 2020). In quintessence, the meaning of leadership for social impact definestheimportant as well as theconstructivealterationswhich will resolve and will try to address the communalunfairness as well as the challenges(Routhieaux, 2015). Organizations accomplish these objectivesall the way throughaware as well aspremeditatedhard work or activities withinprocesses as well as administrations.

Companies can provide influences to their customers as well as the community all the time, although in dissimilar capacities. The Social influences, however, focus on the straight optimistic results these parties proffer to civilization(Barry, 1991).

Leadership for social impact can produce various opportunities which are otherwise engaged to the minorities as well as to the deprived people(Pye, 2005). Companies with this leadership can provide various things to the society and the deprived groups can obtain admittance to an excellent education as well as clean water and also proper gender equality, or capable to get a decent job for their own living and therefore increase the financial growth. Leadership has a straight cause as well as have the consequence on the relationship over the organizations and their achievement(Weick et al., 2005). The organizational leaders decide the values and also cultures that alter the tolerance as well as theworker motivation. They formthe institutional planningconsisting of theimplementation as well asefficiency.

Social impact leadership is the merger of consumerist abilities which are combined with planning as well as leadership, administration, and modernism to make communal, ecological, as well as financial value that proceed in a fair manner and makes optimistic alterations in societies and also universally(Weick et al., 2005).

Community Bank as Leadership for Social Impact
Bendigo Bank was established on the principle that promotes personal responsibility and self-help as well as provides security to the members(Kalish and Luria, 2021). The society then developed into a bank in the mid-90s and helps in restructuring the Australian financial system(Routhieaux, 2015). The Non-executive directors have played an important role in the leadership in the community Bank enterprise. They have volunteered for co-producing the banking services by considering the role of the non-executive directors. Their involvement in the co-production of the community bank has permitted them for the production of an ethical surplus of the self-authenticity as well as connectedness for their local community as well(Hassard and Wolfram Cox, 2013). For the maintenance of the focus on the consultantsengaged, a proper theory of the rural social enterprise is the area of those practitioners within the local societyas well as has the result of this section of theirperformances. As per the theories it can be stated that themost importantquarrel of this section which isfocusedon performances are entrenchedwithin the real as well as enduring relationswho can affectthe motives of theconducts as well as the area ofdecision making. The section mainly indicates the area which can provide both supporting as well as retardingresult(Weick et al., 2005). On the section with provided support, the area of the practitioners within theirrestrictedsocietyoffers their communityventurefor the resources as well aslegalityessential to createthe communaladvantages (Matthews et al., 2021). For all the areas, however, the effect of the section is about slowing down. As per the various theories, the degree of embeddedness augments the variety of obtainableroutes of performanceturn out to be more concentrated. Similarly from the other aspectsthat the entrepreneur who wishes to stay a member of unexactingsociety is subject to a lot of restraint and this is because of areas that referto the roles homogeneity that present to which society members interrelatewith another across a broaddiversity of locationsand this not only for the work howeverfor the various events, in the public organizations as well as at the restricted grocery outlets(Hassard and Wolfram Cox, 2013). According to some other reports it can be claimed thatbecause of some role homogeneity as well as rural communities gets inclined to restrainthe argument. Consequently, the rural social companiesdefine that the areas of the community enterprise practitioners like for those gets engaged in the Community Bank enterprises which can get both optimisticas well asunenthusiasticproperty on their performance(Saha et al., 2020).

Leadership traits
The rural social enterprise leaders possess various traits which can help as well as can hinder the development of the rural social enterprises and the traits of the social enterprise owners include (Barry, 1991).

Social enterprise leaders have to care for a sense of curiosity concerning the people as well as about the trouble they countenance. The most excellent social enterprise leader seeks to truthfullyappreciate the requirements as well asneeds of the persons they provide(Kirkpatick and Locke, 1991). Great communalundertakingactions frequentlybeginfrom side to side of the immersive marketplacestudy, as well as thesympathy-centric procedurefrom side to side which communalentrepreneur’sincreasingformation in the field. For designing theeffectual solutions, the social enterprise ownersshould be enthused by the persons as well as trouble they meet. Inspiration inspires the actions as well as assists the social enterprise's leaders toundertakethe challenges that others stayaway from getting addressed. For the area of the social enterprise leaders, the key resources like the human s well as themonetarycapital can frequently be limited(Mishra et al., 2021). The successful social enterprise leader also knows how to influence the capital at their removal as well asexpandthe pioneering methods to conquerthe obstacles. Alterations of the world take a lot of time as well as effort and testing as well(Kirkpatick and Locke, 1991). While the visions for hugecommunalalterationsmightgive their motivation, experienced communal enterprise ownersare acquainted with that the need to obtainlittle steps in chase of their objectives. The great social course of action is to get born overnight and the social enterprise leadershave tostay open to the answers(Kirkpatick and Locke, 1991). This comprises of knowing when to turn as well as when to change their planning if their first methods do not do well. Flexibility as well assuppleness, isessential in the growth of the early-stage of social enterprises. While embarking on a mission to alter the planetmightsense lonely, it is significant to keep in mind that social entrepreneurship is a group sport, as well as other people, are eager to assist.Social enterprise leaders requireto stay open as well ashelpful to the possible partnership as well as collaboration chances. For a lot of cases, the combined initiatives, as well as the joint-ventures, can attainthe social as well as the business goals much more successfullythan the soloendeavours. Social enterprise leaderscan take a lot of timefor the most daunting confrontations our community has to proffer. This frequentlyproduces a section for the early-stage breakdowns(Pye, 2005). These traits can help as well as can hinder the development of rural social enterprises since these traits have both aspects.

Definition of Distributed Leadership
The term distributed leadership is the theoretical as well as the analytical step for knowing how the area of leadership acts amongst the individuals as well as in the context of a multifaceted association(Conger, 1999). However urban as well as principally utilised area in the learning research, it is implemented to the other areas, consisting of the trades and other businesses. It is chieflyworried about the preparation of leadership instead of theexact leadership errands or the roles(Samul, 2020). It associates with the shared as well as the communal and the complete leadership practice which builds the ability for alterations as well asdevelopment.

Distributed leadership defines the area of mobilising the leadership knowledgeat various levels within the business in order to produce more chances for the alterations as well as to construct the capability for the development(Conger, 1999). The emphasis relies on interdependent communication as well aspreparationinstead of the individual and sovereign actions linked with those with official leadership positions as well aserrands.

This distributed leadership posses variousbenefits such as increasing the initiative, originality as well as impulsiveness and consequentlypersons have the authority to put an impact on the events(Canterino et al., 2020). However theanswerabilityis there with the manager, persons are guarded both from the danger as well as with the rewards(Kark et al., 2003).

This has appeared around the year 2000 from the sociological as well as cognitive, mental, and other theories, most significantly dispersed cognition as well as action theory, although also prejudiced by the various communities around the practice. It was imagined that the theoretical, as well as logical structure for studying the areas, are the ones that can openly focus on the attention on how the areas were taken inside the business(Bass, 1997). The following areas are the most important qualities as well as behaviours of this sort of distributed leadership including the The constructive displeasure with the present most excellent practices as well as the want to take action for the achievement in the breakthrough outcomes is important(Sosik et al., 2020).

Having Intentional risk-taking is another region where the Individuals as well as the organizations, and the systems make use of their information of science to discover the original, as well as various ideas targeted for the improvement of the long-term results for the owners for the adversity(Conger, 1999). Failure is quite essential for learning as well as innovating and avoiding the breakdowncan guide to the missed chances to learn from the errors as well asdiscover the new ways of working.

Distributed Leadership: An effective model for social impact
The distributed leadership has offered an effective model of leadership to the Mangrove community bank and it can be stated from the case study that it can help this bank to provide better service and have higher organizational performances(Reinecke and Ansari, 2016). It can be evaluated that this system possesses various advantages including getting more responsive to the consumer needs as well as improved quality for the process of decisions making which leaders to a stronger sense of ownership(Canterino et al., 2020). It provides more capitalist, consequently produces more plans as well as creative ideas. This includes the generation of enhanced levels of incentive as well as eagerness(Rouleau, 2005). This consists of other things such as a convenient method to run the desired multifaceted stress and offers a chance to observe the role as well as the work for the leaders as well as how to expand in the direction of these roles. This includes other things and involves better teamwork as well as better connections among the academics as well as the managers/administrators(Rouleau, 2005). This has helped the Mangrove community Bank through enhancing communications and this has promoted the shared information as well as have reduces the probability of one individual holding the maindata. This has helped the chosen organization as

• It associates with the joint, communal as well as extended management practice whichconstructs the capability for the alterations as well asdevelopment(Hollenbeck et al., 2006). Distributed leadership signifies the mobilising of the leadership knowledgeat various levels within the businessfor the generation of more chances for the alterations as well as to construct the ability for the development.

• This has provided the chosen organization with more opportunities. For instance, if there is one manager who is stimulating with the creation of the decisions for the corporation, then the absence of him/her can create issues so when there is a shovein the direction of distributed leadership for this company, there are more alternatives which are available for the corporation(Rouleau, 2005).

• This has helped the Mangrove community bank to retain the elements of the traditional chain of commands and thisassociationmainly focuses on the leadership style which features the command as well as helps incontrolling the features(Hollenbeck et al., 2006). They desire to confirm that every person identifiesthe person that directs the superior.

Conclusion
It can be started from the above part that leadership for social impact signifies the most important or the optimistic alterations which solve or at least address the social injustice and the dilemmas. Several businesses and companies attain these targets by the means of aware as well as purposeful efforts or acts within their organizational functions and administrations. This assignment will focus on the leadership for social impact with a concept clearing in-depth definition and will also focus on the Bendigo Community Bank initiative with proper utilization of the provided case study. When there is no simple method for trades as well as companies to decrease the social expenses, there are a lot of methods to attain the social impacts. Many traders as well as companies, and foundations are putting their aware efforts in the direction of achieving greater and the leaders are trying their best to put effort with their leadership to make a social impact. In quintessence, the meaning of leadership for social impact defines the important as well as the constructive alterations which will resolve and will try to address the communal unfairness as well as the challenges(Kark et al., 2003).Bendigo Bank was established on the principle that promotes personal responsibility and self-help as well as provides security to the members. Distributed leadership defines the area of mobilising the leadership knowledge at various levels within the business in order to produce more chances for the alterations as well as to construct the capability for the development. Hence every aspect is clear in the above region.

References
Banks, G.C., Fischer, T., Gooty, J. and Stock, G., 2021. Ethical leadership: Mapping the terrain for concept cleanup and a future research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(2), p.101471.

Barry, D., 1991. Managing the bossless team: Lessons in distributed leadership. Organizational dynamics, 20(1), pp.31-47.

Bass, B.M., 1997. Does the transactional–transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries?. American psychologist, 52(2), p.130.

Canterino, F., Cirella, S., Piccoli, B. and Shani, A.B.R., 2020. Leadership and change mobilization: The mediating role of distributed leadership. Journal of Business Research, 108, pp.42-51.

Chou, C.Y. and Naimi, L.L., 2020. A Discussion of Leadership Theories as they Relate to Information Systems Leadership. Leadership assignmentLeadership & Organizational Management Journal, 2020(2), pp.1-10. Conger, J.A., 1999. Charismatic and transformational leadership in organizations: An insider's perspective on these developing streams of research. The leadership quarterly, 10(2), pp.145-179.

Hassard, J. and Wolfram Cox, J., 2013. Can sociological paradigms still inform organizational analysis? A paradigm model for post-paradigm times. Organization Studies, 34(11), pp.1701-1728.

Hollenbeck, G.P., McCall Jr, M.W. and Silzer, R.F., 2006. Leadership competency models. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(4), pp.398-413. Kalish, Y. and Luria, G., 2021. Traits and time in leadership emergence: A longitudinal study. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(2), p.101443.

Kark, R., Shamir, B. and Chen, G., 2003. The two faces of transformational leadership: Empowerment and dependency. Journal of applied psychology, 88(2), p.246.

Kirkpatick, S.A. and Locke, E.A., 1991. Leadership: do traits matter?. Academy of management perspectives, 5(2), pp.48-60.

Matthews, S.H., Kelemen, T.K. and Bolino, M.C., 2021. How follower traits and cultural values influence the effects of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, p.101497.

Mishra, R., Singh, R.K. and Koles, B., 2021. Consumer decision?making in Omnichannel retailing: Literature review and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(2), pp.147-174. Pye, A., 2005. Leadership and organizing: Sensemaking in action. Leadership, 1(1), pp.31-49.

Reinecke, J. and Ansari, S., 2016. Taming wicked problems: The role of framing in the construction of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management Studies, 53(3), pp.299-329.

Rouleau, L., 2005. Micro?practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: How middle managers interpret and sell change every day. Journal of Management studies, 42(7), pp.1413-1441.

Routhieaux, R.L., 2015. Shared leadership and its implications for nonprofit leadership. The Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership, 5(3).

Saha, R., Cerchione, R., Singh, R. and Dahiya, R., 2020. Effect of ethical leadership and corporate social responsibility on firm performance: A systematic review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), pp.409-429.

Samul, J., 2020. The Research Topics of Leadership: Bibliometric Analysis from 1923 to 2019. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 8(2), pp.116-143.

Sosik, J.J., Chun, J.U. and Ete, Z., 2020. Character and leadership. The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences: Clinical, Applied, and Cross?Cultural Research, pp.505-510.

Weick, K.E., Sutcliffe, K.M. and Obstfeld, D., 2005. Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization science, 16(4), pp.409-421.