Aviation Management Assignment: Air Traffic Management In Brisbane International Airport
Question
Task:
In this aviation management assignment, you will be required to conduct a case-based essay on Brisbane International Airport that involved CNS/ATM issues. In this case study, you will need to conduct an evaluation of the scenario, identify the problem, diagnosis, proof of causes, and action plan. The essay must be conducted from an air traffic management aspect.
Answer
Introduction
As per the investigation on aviation management assignment, it is stated that Brisbane is an international airport serving Brisbane and South East Queensland. It provides aviation-related services to customers and including air traffic management (ATM) related systems. In the field of aviation, traffic control is one of the major problems that affect the performance and efficiency of aeroplanes. CNS refers to the communication, navigation and surveillance-related programs that enable the pilot and airport to deliver proper instructions and communication-related facilities. Miss-communication is one of the major problems associated with the Brisbane airport where the loss of signals regarding whether and airflow can increase critical conditions and influence monitoring systems negatively. The aim of this research is to analyze and review the communication-related issues with Brisbane airport that affect air traffic management. This research will cover various sections such as problem definition, diagnosis, causal link and action plan.
Problem definition
Brisbane international airport mainly focuses on CNS and air traffic management systems in order to deliver proper support to the pilot and updates related to air, noise and weather. Communication plays a major contribution in the enhancement of safety and monitoring of air traffic. Brisbane uses wireless communication technologies linked with the RADAR system that depends on the internet and connectivity of the communication networks (Berger, 2015). The presence of unwanted signals, traffic and errors in the communication systems can lead to reduce safety and affect the performance of both aeroplanes and airports negatively.
Miss-communication between controllers and pilots can increase the chances of crashes and signals or data related to operations can be shared with distortion and errors. The involvement of less effective and secured communication channels with aviation can leads to increase chances of crashes and connected systems can be affected negatively (Chatzi, et al., 2019). Miss-communication is a type of ATM problem that produce communication gaps and challenges in data sharing and exchanging. Brisbane airport has suffered from communication-related problems due to improper air control management and communication networks for airplanes. This research will provide depth analysis of miss-communication in air traffic management used by Brisbane airport and its implications on aviation operations and traffic controls for airplanes.
Diagnosis
Brisbane international airport performs communication-related activities through radio communication and wireless networks. It is common for Brisbane airport to face communication and connectivity related problems for air traffic management that produce conflicts in the transmission of signals from the controller to the aeroplane and increase failure related problems (Clark, & Tomato, 2017). It is found that the major cause of miss-communication in Brisbane international airport is connectivity problem as communication systems are connected with computing networks and communication protocols that are not capable to manage errors and bugs (Holtaway, et al., 2017). Improper communication between pilot and air traffic management can increase critical conditions to monitor airplanes.
The language barrier is another cause of communication gaps in air traffic management. The words and inflexion included between pilot and flight controllers are critical and English speakers in aviation management are likely to cause miss-communication and miss-understanding (Hazrati, 2015). Due to incorrect terminology, pilot and flight controllers can suffer from communication-related problems and misuse of standardized phrases and terms can cause fatal injuries. It is found that communication gaps in aviation management can leads to increase crashes and serious injuries. Mainly, the pilot receives data from air traffic management including airflow, noise, weather conditions and failures that help them to increase the safety and effectiveness of the flights. However, miss-communication that happens in flight can produce accident-related concerns. While technological advancements have enabled text messaging between planes and ground employees, air traffic controllers and pilots still communicate via radio. Electrical systems, power sources, microphones, and speakers, as well as digital communication programs, can all obstruct successful communication. Therefore, all these are major causes of the communication gaps and Brisbane can suffer from safety and crashes related challenges easily.
Casual link
In the context of flight controlling and air traffic management, proper communication platforms are required to send or receive data related to air traffic can be performed in a significant manner. A major causal link for miss-communication in Brisbane airport is the lack of proper communication protocols or architecture. The implementation of less effective communication architecture in aviation operations can produce challenges related to accessibility and air traffic. It is important for Brisbane airport to manage such problems so that communication gaps can be minimized. Moreover, lack of knowledge about miss-configuration of communication is another casual link for miss-communication that can affect air traffic management and reduce connectivity between pilots and flight controllers.
Kim, & Billington, (2018) agreed and stated that the collision between the data transmitter and receiver channels can lead to increase miscommunication and gaps easily. In Brisbane airport, data transmitted by radio communication can be affected due to the presence of distortion, noise and weather conditions and the overall effectiveness of communication systems can be affected. Absent-mindedness is a type of miss-communication which controllers and flight operators can make occasionally and data transmitted by the controllers cannot be received properly (Molesworth, & Estival, 2015). For example, the air traffic control can routinely assign a similar level for the descent to arrive aeroplane that can produce conflicts and increase chances of accidents. Due to incorrect terminology, pilot and flight controllers can suffer from communication-related problems and misuse of standardized phrases and terms can cause fatal injuries. Aviation safety continues to be jeopardized by miscommunication.
There are numerous Factors affecting communication among flight operator and controls including the pilot’s workload, effectiveness of the signal, the accent of the pilot or controller, language problem and failure to observe the transmitted signals. Due to less effective communication channels and networks, the transmitted data can be hacked and communication related problems can be increased (Touiserkani & Hazrati, 2020). In aviation, communication is still an issue. However, if the operational requirements for flying become too rigorous, even a high level of English language proficiency will not be enough to provide appropriate communication. As a result of the current study, it is obvious that a greater emphasis should be placed on strengthening pilot communication skills. Therefore, it is important that Brisbane airport can suffer from safety and injuries due to miscommunication between air traffic controllers and flight operators.
Action plan
In order to manage communication-related problems from Brisbane airport, it is recommended that effective communication architecture should be developed that can cover communication models like OSI to improve communication and connectivity. Moreover, a communication controlling team should be developed that can help to monitor errors and distortions from communication networks and reduce gaps effectively (Wu, et al., 2019).
ATC clearance, controller’s hearback and pilot’s read back should be connected with the secured and proper communication protocols so that communication gaps can be minimized. For 2 years plan, it is recommended that Brisbane airport should change the current communication models and include wireless sensor networks and effective radio communication models so that data can be secured and shared effectively.
For 5 years plan, Brisbane should develop the virtual communication platforms and should include encoding and decoding programs that can manage communication issues and increase effectiveness of radio communication. The involvement of modulation and multiplexing techniques can leads to reduce communication gaps and manage air or noise problems by which both flight controllers and operators can exchange data effectively. Therefore, all these are effective strategies and methods that should be followed by Brisbane airport to manage miss-communication related problems from air traffic management.
Conclusion
It may be concluded that miss-communication between flight controller and operators can leads to increase failure and accidents related problems easily. This research helped to review and evaluate the communication gaps and its causes on air controllers and overall performance. It is found that the words and inflection included between pilot and flight controllers are critical and English spokers in aviation management are likely cause miss-communication and miss-understanding. It is important for Brisbane airport to manage such problems so that communication gaps can be minimized. Moreover, lack of knowledge about miss-configuration of communication is another casual link for miss-communication that can affect air traffic management and reduce connectivity between pilot and flight controllers. ATC clearance,, controller’s hearback and pilot’s read back should be connected with the secured and proper communication protocols so that communication gaps can be minimized.
References
Berger, C. R. (2015). Communication Failure/Miscommunication. The International Encyclopedia of Interpersonal Communication, 1-11.
Chatzi, A. V., Martin, W., Bates, P., & Murray, P. (2019). The unexplored link between communication and trust in aviation maintenance practice. Aerospace, 6(6), 66.
Clark, B., & Tomato, Y. S. (2017). Aviation English Research Project: Data analysis findings and best practice recommendations. West Sussex: UK CAA, UK.
Hazrati, A. (2015). Intercultural communication and discourse analysis: The case of Aviation English. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 244-251.
Holtaway, L. E., Jackson, K., & Hubbard Ph D, S. M. (2017). Facilitating communication for aviation training and maintenance. Aviation management assignment In 19th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (p. 276).
Kim, H., & Billington, R. (2018). Pronunciation and comprehension in English as a lingua franca communication: Effect of L1 influence in international aviation communication. Applied linguistics, 39(2), 135-158.
Molesworth, B. R., & Estival, D. (2015). Miscommunication in general aviation: The influence of external factors on communication errors. Safety science, 73, 73-79.
Touiserkani, F., & Hazrati, A. (2020). Analysis of Aviation Miscommunications based on Grice’s Conversational Maxims: The Case of Iranian Aviators. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Translation Studies, 5(2), 119-134.
Wu, Q., Molesworth, B. R., & Estival, D. (2019). An investigation into the factors that affect miscommunication between pilots and air traffic controllers in commercial aviation. The international journal of aerospace psychology, 29(1-2), 53-63.
